[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: GMPLS signaling documents updated per last calls



On the mpls-generalized-signaling draft, can someone please summarize the agreements regarding the LSP encoding types? I previously made the comments to merge the (1) SDH and SONET values as one value (i.e. ITU-T G.707)and (2) ANSI PDH and ETSI PDH values as one value (i.e. ITU-T PDH)? The latest draft does not show any changes on the LSP encoding types.

Deborah Brungard
AT&T

-----Original Message-----
From: Lou Berger [mailto:lberger@movaz.com]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 4:05 PM
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Cc: bwijnen@lucent.com; sob@harvard.edu
Subject: GMPLS signaling documents updated per last calls


All,
	As was discussed in this morning's SUB-IP session, the GMPLS signaling 
documents have been updated to reflect comments received during the 
extended last call.  If you believe an issue that you have previously 
raised has not been addressed in the drafts, please send a message to the 
list.  (We'll respond with either how the issue was addressed or if it was 
missed.)

Here's a summary of changes:

draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-signaling-07.txt
see http://www.labn.net/docs/diff-sig-06-07.txt for change bar version.
o changes were primarily in the area of GPID values.
	(Juergen has a couple of additions that we'll incorporate in next rev.)

draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-rsvp-te-06.txt
see http://www.labn.net/docs/diff-rsvp-05-06.txt
o Minor editorial changes and clarifications based on comments from list

draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-cr-ldp-05.txt
http://www.labn.net/docs/diff-ldp-04-05.txt
o Brings cr-ldp functionally in line with rsvp-te
o Revised Admin Status Usage (per comments and also removed potential race 
condition)
o Clarified text related to interface bundling (To be consistent with 
updated bundling draft.)
o Added IANA Considerations
o Minor editorial changes and clarifications

Lou