[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Transport networks and draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-rsvp-te [ was Re: GMPLS signaling documents updated per last calls]
- To: "Gopal Kailad" <gkailad@acm.org>
- Subject: Re: Transport networks and draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-rsvp-te [ was Re: GMPLS signaling documents updated per last calls]
- From: Lou Berger <lberger@movaz.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 15:49:24 -0500
- Cc: "Berger, Lou" <lberger@movaz.com>,<ccamp@ops.ietf.org>,<bwijnen@lucent.com>,<sob@harvard.edu>,<gkailad@acm.org>,<yxue@uu.net>,<jls@att.com>,<jyates@research.att.com>,<mei@research.att.com>,<ananth.nagarajan@mail.sprint.com>,<wesam.alanqar@mail.sprint.com>,<lynn.neir@mail.sprint.com>,<tammy.ferris@mail.sprint.com>,<hirokazu@japan-telecom.co.jp>,<olga.aparicio@cwusa.com>,<steven.wright@snt.bellsouth.com>,<mlazer@att.com>
- In-reply-to: <3C21F7F5.4090807@acm.org>
- References: <4.3.2.7.2.20011210133532.01de13a8@mo-ex1>
At 09:38 AM 12/20/2001, Gopal Kailad wrote:
>The Restart Time field in the Restart_Cap object supports a
>maximum value of about 49 days. In case of transport networks,
>this would mean that in case of a controller failure due to say,
>a natural disaster, if the node is not accessible, established
>connections will fail after 49 days even if data plane is not
>affected, which is unacceptable.
You're right. This looks like a blown edit. The 0xffffffff value applies
to Restart not recovery time. I'll move the text. I'll also elaborate for
a bit more clarity.
Thanks,
Lou