[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] summary of reordering discussion



At 6:29 PM +0900 11/13/01, Soobok Lee wrote:
>It depends on whether or not   nameprep's "query" could contain 
>unassigned code
>points (UCP).

Of course it can. The nameprep document is very clear on this, and 
has been for quite some time.

>Patrick and Paul have given me different ideas on the desired answer 
>to this UCP question.

That is simply not true, and another ugly accusation. You have a 
habit of misquoting people who have tried to help you and the WG deal 
with the supposed problems that you bring up; the recent issues with 
you saying that Kent Karlsson said one thing when he said another is 
a good example of this.

It is disturbing that the main proponent of the reordering draft does 
not even understand the basics of the other protocols being discussed 
in this WG. It casts a very negative light on the reordering 
discussion. I hope that people voicing their opinions in the straw 
poll are not swayed by your misunderstandings.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium