[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Backwards compatability with existing IPv6 [was: Re: Networklayer reqt? [was Re: Transport level multihoming]]
- To: <multi6@ops.ietf.org>
- Subject: Re: Backwards compatability with existing IPv6 [was: Re: Networklayer reqt? [was Re: Transport level multihoming]]
- From: Vijay Gill <vijay@umbc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 15:06:05 -0400
- Delivery-date: Fri, 06 Apr 2001 12:06:27 -0700
- Envelope-to: multi6-data@psg.com
On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Vijay Gill wrote:
> If the take rate of v6 starts to approach that of historical growth rate
> of v4, then what installed base is a very valid question to ask. 100x
> todays v6 installed base is ~ 4 doublings and thats a year worth of growth
> in V4 space.
I am so used to taking natural logs, I forgot to do the conversion to base
2 as was immediately pointed out to me by several people.
I am duly abashed now.
/vijay