RE: Resolving geo discussions

["Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>]

That is a very fair question. If we cannot do that we should not use up
IETF finances for brainstorming with no agenda.  Times are not good the
IETF must use their resources wisely for sure.

If we build content and agenda and force some agreement and compromise
we may be able to move forward. 

As far as brainstorming I did it one night with Michel, Christian, and a
few others I think we want to do that not in formal meeting whenever
possible.

Suggestion:

Work on content and agenda so we can have meeting.  Realize folks will
show up who are not here too and so that will, as always, be variable to
the processes so the chairs have to try to focus the meeting.  I know
this is normal but wanted to state it.

Agenda:

Requirements state - Chairs

Location and Identification Architecture (can we agree on some base
principles before the IETF and then present them at IETF) - ???

Routing Problem and Complexity and where the fix has to be (same if we
can agree on base that would be useful to IETF attendees) - ????

Existing work that has input to the above loc/id and route complexity
issues:

1) MAP (michel) (send in IDs)
2) Mobile IPv6 idea (christian) (send in IDs)
3) HIP (pekka N.) (send in IDs)

Working Group Next Plans - Chairs.

NOTE - Not sure if we agree to put out base GEO doc stuff but that
INFO/BCP could be agenda item too but I did not see consensus on the
mail list from my view ????

Post IETF - I can look into hosting mutli6 offline whatever meeting in
New Hampshire late September before fall IETF meeting for brainstorm
part II as we need to do what Tony stated before that and this can be
part II.  Times are tough for vendors but I will go ask for support of
an offsite if folks want.  Good to schedule so folks can check out fall
colors up here too if possible :---)  Given that I am alive and well
after my Harley adventure and come back to the system :---) 

Regards,
/jim


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy@psg.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 10:53 PM
> To: Bound, Jim
> Cc: Tony Li; multi6@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Resolving geo discussions
> 
> 
> > Why can't we develop an agenda with content and use that as 
> discussion 
> > content and request an agenda.
> 
> good question.  that is THE question, and the lack thereof is 
> why there have been no meetings.
> 
> randy
> 
>