[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Consensus on identifier/locator split?

To: Tony Li <Tony.Li@procket.com>
Subject: Re: Consensus on identifier/locator split?
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 11:17:34 -0700
Cc: multi6@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <D2EC481073504E498A8DB9C0687E8CAF0732049F@EXCHANGE0-0.na.procket.com>
References: <D2EC481073504E498A8DB9C0687E8CAF0732049F@EXCHANGE0-0.na.procket.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

I don't know whether we have consensus but I think it's a good idea.

Eliot

References:
- Consensus on identifier/locator split?
  - From: "Tony Li" <Tony.Li@procket.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Consensus on identifier/locator split?
Next by Date: RE: Consensus on identifier/locator split?
Previous by thread: Re: Consensus on identifier/locator split?
Next by thread: RE: Consensus on identifier/locator split?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread