RE: RIR bashing, was: Routing table size?

["Ray Plzak" <plzak@arin.net>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-multi6@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-multi6@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Iljitsch van Beijnum
> Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 8:47 AM
> To: Ray Plzak
> Cc: multi6@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: RIR bashing, was: Routing table size?
> 
> Giving out /32s ONLY in IPv6 and /20s mostly in IPv4 isn't a good 
> policy. Sometimes people need to be globally visible without the need 
> for such a large block, and the largest ISPs burn through them fast 
> enough to warrant giving them much larger blocks.


I suggest that you subscribe to the global IPv6 policy list 

 http://www.apnic.net/community/lists/index.html

and post this thought there.

Ray