[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: RADEXT WG last call on RFC 2486bis

To: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, "Bernard Aboba" <aboba@internaut.com>
Subject: RE: RADEXT WG last call on RFC 2486bis
From: "Nelson, David" <dnelson@enterasys.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:30:29 -0500
Cc: <radiusext@ops.ietf.org>

> 2) Like Pasi, I'm a bit puzzled why we need another LC
> on this document. We already had a last call and all
> issues were resolved, the issue tracker does not show
> anything remaining.

I thought we were looking for affirmative acknowledgement from the
previous commenters that all the issues had been appropriately addressed
in the revised draft.

-- Dave



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RADEXT WG last call on RFC 2486bis
  - From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>

Prev by Date: RE: Progress on RADIUS Extension for Digest Authentication
Next by Date: CUI: WG Work Item
Previous by thread: RE: REMINDER: RADEXT WG last call on RFC 2486bis-02
Next by thread: Re: RADEXT WG last call on RFC 2486bis
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread