RE: Continued discussion of RADIUS Crypto-Agility

["Glen Zorn \(gwz\)" <gwz@cisco.com>]

Stephen Hanna <mailto:shanna@juniper.net> allegedly scribbled on
Wednesday, August 01, 2007 10:32 AM:

> Thanks, Dan. I'm glad you did suggest that we consider the RADSEC
> work. 

> Now we can consider the alternatives on their technical merits

Hang on a minute, here.  This is absolutely NOT "an alternative" for the
crypto-agility work.

> and set aside the charter or process questions for the moment (to be
> revisited if necessary).   
> 
> I have asked Juniper's RADIUS experts to join us for this discussion.

Since it is pretty painfully obvious that RADSEC is NOT RADIUS, what
will they have to say?

> They should be here within a few hours. Sorry for the delay. 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Steve
> 

...

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>