RE: Extensibility of draft-ietf-radext-filter-rules

["David B. Nelson" <dnelson@elbrysnetworks.com>]

Hannes Tschofenig writes...

> Right. There is, however, a timing issue involved with the work and
> I am not sure when the corresponding work in RADIUS gets done. Do 
> you have an estimate?

Well, we've moved forward today to having accepted the draft as a WG
document and the editor has indicated that a revised -00 draft will be
posted sometime this week.

It would be nice to think that we could be ready for a WGLC within a few
weeks, unless we get bogged down in comment resolution from the initial
formal review.  In an optimistic scenario, one might envision completion of
WGLC prior to IETF-70.  :-)



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>