Re: Extensibility of draft-ietf-radext-filter-rules

[Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>]

Hi David,

David B. Nelson wrote:
> Hannes Tschofenig writes...
>
>   
> > I have sent a few mails regarding the extensibility of
> > draft-ietf-radext-filter-rules
> >
> > I have never received a response on how it should look like.
> >     
>
> This is an open issue against that document and we need to resolve it here
> on the list.  Will the authors please comment?
>
>   
> > As I indicated in a previous mail we have guessed one approach in 
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dime-qos-attributes-01.txt.
> > It uses grouped AVPs and is therefore not great for RADIUS.
> >     
>
> Maybe.  Keep in mind that the Extended RADIUS attribute work is introducing
> a method of accommodating grouped attributes (AVPs) in RADIUS.
>
>   
Right. There is, however, a timing issue involved with the work and I am 
not sure when the corresponding work in RADIUS gets done. Do you have an 
estimate?

Ciao
Hannes

> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
>   


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>