RE: Questions on modified Extended Attribute format?

["Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>]

> I'm not at all sure why that would be the case; I don't recall the IETF
> bending over backwards to be compatible w/anyone else's VSAs...

  The last thing I need right now is yet another incompatible VSA format.
[gwz] 
I understand, & sympathize; I think that it's important to remember that a
major reason that we ended up in the position of having multiple external
SDOs defining their own mutually incompatible VSAs is that we (the IETF)
refused to address RADIUS' problems in a useful and meaningful way.  We have
an opportunity now to ameliorate if not solve that problem; I don't think
that we should pass it up.
[/gwz]

...


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>