RE: Questions on modified Extended Attribute format?

["Matt Holdrege" <Matt.Holdrege@strixsystems.com>]

No kidding. I think my first RADIUS WG meeting was almost 12 years ago at IETF 35. Take a look at http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/96mar/area.and.wg.reports/ops/radius/radius.html and read the minutes.

You might laugh at the irony, or more likely cry. Are the current AD's aware of the history here?

-Matt

-----Original Message-----
From: Glen Zorn [mailto:glenzorn@comcast.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 11:12 PM
To: Matt Holdrege
Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org; 'Alan DeKok'
Subject: RE: Questions on modified Extended Attribute format?

Glen,

Didn't you say this same exact thing here a year or two ago? Or am I
stuck in a time warp? Or is this group stuck in a time warp?

[gwz] Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose... [/gwz]

-Matt (I'll go back into my hole now)


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org]
On Behalf Of Glen Zorn
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 9:06 PM
To: 'Alan DeKok'
Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
Subject: RE: Questions on modified Extended Attribute format?

[gwz] 
I understand, & sympathize; I think that it's important to remember that
a
major reason that we ended up in the position of having multiple
external
SDOs defining their own mutually incompatible VSAs is that we (the IETF)
refused to address RADIUS' problems in a useful and meaningful way.  We
have
an opportunity now to ameliorate if not solve that problem; I don't
think
that we should pass it up.
[/gwz]


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>