Hi Brian,
You wrote:
RW> I can't avoid the conclusion that we are likely to be stuck with
RW> IPv4 and NAT forever. I would be happy for someone to prove me
wrong!
The model has always been to plan for an indefinite period of
co-existence, with the background assumption that after some
large number of years, IPv4-only devices would die a natural
death. Whether you include that assumption or not has no
practical impact today in terms of what we should do.
I should have written "several decades" rather than "forever".
The main task of the RRG is to choose some architectural proposals -
probably for improving BGP and for a new IP-level ITR-ETR tunneling
system for both IPv4 and IPv6 - to be developed and widely deployed
in a timeframe of a few years.
I'm not sure that discussion beyond that point belongs on RRG.
I believe it is pertinent, since I sense a number of folks here -
perhaps including yourself - seem to think that the solution is to
migrate to IPv6.