Re: [RRG] Mobility in the future -- civil aviation mobility

[Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>]

Yes, of course. Thanks for the clarification.

Jari

Fleischman, Eric kirjoitti:
> I believe that MEXT is inherently off topic for this list because MEXT
> relies upon NEMO and NEMO does not cause mobility impacts upon the
> Internet scaling that I am aware of -- possibly unlike the other
> mobility alternatives.
>
> However, the MEXT work presumes using NEMO and solely limits
> considerations of civil aviation requirements to NEMO solutions. It is
> accurate to say that there are individuals within the civil aviation
> community who are interested in NEMO and MEXT as possible solutions for
> aircraft mobility, but any assertion that MEXT represents a civil
> aviation consensus would be very inaccurate at this current time.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.arkko@piuha.net] 
>
>   
>> FWIW, we have an existing WG in the IETF to 
>> look at the aviation mobility case, MEXT. They 
>> are in stage 1, understanding what the requirements are.
>>     
>
>
>
>   


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg