[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RRG] map-and-map (vs map-and-encaps) - further thoughts

To: Brian Dickson <briand@ca.afilias.info>
Subject: Re: [RRG] map-and-map (vs map-and-encaps) - further thoughts
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 09:49:43 +1300
Cc: Routing Research Group list <rrg@psg.com>, Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>, Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>, Tony Li <tli@cisco.com>
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=XLyGCsHuXDQ0p6Pq4Ei/I7w8/pj7nwiiei/Cw925Xx3n2XPcSo28NDNW7AIm+ZigASczIGgE7aUCJiKuCwUdvNoXLDl10ut+nGpyQ8ueN1M3rjScdsaB7dfNR4mnVxtN6C0Stu2vw5GU6JWkwgo3LO8xeiGvcZVQLomC/FOz4hA=
In-reply-to: <477F3E34.203@ca.afilias.info>
Organization: University of Auckland
References: <A7AB4880-E1F1-4AEE-8913-FC9EE8F9CDC2@muada.com> <477BF1D4.5050209@ca.afilias.info> <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A1029EDD4F@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com> <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A1029EDD50@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com> <477C3AAA.7000808@ca.afilias.info> <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A1029EDD52@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com> <477E0590.7000400@ca.afilias.info> <477F0BC4.9080900@gmail.com> <477F3E34.203@ca.afilias.info>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)

Each EID block gets mapped to a set of RLOC blocks, but each RLOC blockonly has one EID block mapped to it.


Doesn't that mean there will be far more RLOC prefixes than EID
prefixes?

    Brian

--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RRG] map-and-map (vs map-and-encaps) - further thoughts
  - From: Brian Dickson <briand@ca.afilias.info>

References:
- Re: [RRG] MTU/fragmentation AGAIN
  - From: Brian Dickson <briand@ca.afilias.info>
- RE: [RRG] MTU/fragmentation AGAIN
  - From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
- RE: [RRG] MTU/fragmentation AGAIN
  - From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
- Re: [RRG] MTU/fragmentation AGAIN
  - From: Brian Dickson <briand@ca.afilias.info>
- RE: [RRG] MTU/fragmentation AGAIN
  - From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
- [RRG] map-and-map (vs map-and-encaps) - further thoughts
  - From: Brian Dickson <briand@ca.afilias.info>
- Re: [RRG] map-and-map (vs map-and-encaps) - further thoughts
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
- Re: [RRG] map-and-map (vs map-and-encaps) - further thoughts
  - From: Brian Dickson <briand@ca.afilias.info>

Prev by Date: Re: [RRG] Tunnel fragmentation/reassembly for RRG map-and-encaps architectures
Next by Date: Re: [RRG] map-and-map (vs map-and-encaps) - further thoughts
Previous by thread: Re: [RRG] map-and-map (vs map-and-encaps) - further thoughts
Next by thread: Re: [RRG] map-and-map (vs map-and-encaps) - further thoughts
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread