Re: [RRG] Consensus check: mapping granularity

[Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>]

Excerpts from Tony Li on Fri, Mar 21, 2008 02:32:25PM -0700:
> |> I would think that we would want to support it as the same level of
> |> scalability as coarser aggregates.  However, we have not yet
> |> discussed what level of scalability is a necessity.  Yet another
> |> item on the discussion list...
> |
> |"at the same level of scalability" ... I have decided I can't figure
> |out what you mean.  Are you saying that if we can support 10^10
> |prefixes we should be able to support 10^10 individual entries as
> |well?
> 
> No, I was suggesting that we should support N entries, regardless of
> the scope of each entry.

So, the cost of an individual entry should be the same regardless of
the scope of the entry??





--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg