RE: [RRG] Consensus check: mapping granularity

["Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>]

|> I would think that we would want to support it as the same level of
|> scalability as coarser aggregates.  However, we have not yet
|> discussed what level of scalability is a necessity.  Yet another
|> item on the discussion list...
|
|"at the same level of scalability" ... I have decided I can't figure
|out what you mean.  Are you saying that if we can support 10^10
|prefixes we should be able to support 10^10 individual entries as
|well?


No, I was suggesting that we should support N entries, regardless of the
scope of each entry.

Tony


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg