Eric, On May 27, 2008, at 2:24 PM, Fleischman, Eric wrote:
From: David Conrad [mailto:drc@virtualized.org]Some might argue that if time isn't a consideration, the right way to "Do It Right" is to throw out IPv6 as an abject failure and start anew.I must be missing something: why are we concluding that IPv6 is an abject failure?
Note that I am not asserting this is a conclusion, rather that the argument has been (frequently) made that IPv6 only solves the amount of address space problem (poorly) and doesn't address routing scalability, the need to renumber should you change providers, or multi-homing. Further, as evidenced by the lack of any significant deployment after a dozen years, it can be argued that IPv6 has been a clear market failure.
Regards, -drc -- to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg