[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: "Doing It Right" (was Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem ...)

To: IRTF RRG <rrg@psg.com>
Subject: RE: "Doing It Right" (was Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem ...)
From: Randall Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 16:23:16 -0700
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
In-reply-to: <C45656FA-41CF-4365-8EA4-F85662F488D7@virtualized.org>
References: <483934A7.90800@firstpr.com.au> <8329C86009B2F24493D76B486146769A9DDC072E@USEXCHANGE.corp.extremenetworks.com> <48397AB9.1020501@firstpr.com.au>,<483A1A83.4080208@gmail.com> <8329C86009B2F24493D76B486146769A9DDC073F@USEXCHANGE.corp.extremenetworks.com> <754A8DE4E3F64660BD83CEFCBE007FE1@ad.redback.com> <3525C9833C09ED418C6FD6CD9514668C03EC0237@emailwf1.jnpr.net>,<DD4088F4-53EF-476D-8ED7-C51312261761@virtualized.org> <8329C86009B2F24493D76B486146769A9DDC0751@USEXCHANGE.corp.extremenetworks.com>,<C45656FA-41CF-4365-8EA4-F85662F488D7@virtualized.org>

On May 27, 2008, at 2:57 PM, Randall Atkinson wrote:
> Historical archeology indicates that the current issues with multi-
> homing
> and mobility (and the need for some built-in TE capability) were all
> known in July 1997 [e.g. IEN-1] -- before IPv4 was deployed.

I was typing too fast I guess...      s/1997/1977/

Google for ien001.pdf and you'll find the document.

Ran


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Doing It Right" (was Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem ...)
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>

References:
- [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6
  - From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
- RE: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6
  - From: Randall Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>
- Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6
  - From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
- Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
- RE: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6
  - From: Randall Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>
- RE: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6
  - From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
- RE: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6
  - From: "Ross Callon" <rcallon@juniper.net>
- "Doing It Right" (was Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem ...)
  - From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>

Prev by Date: RE: [RRG] Consensus? 4 points so we can make progress
Next by Date: RE: [RRG] Consensus? 4 points so we can make progress
Previous by thread: Re: "Doing It Right" (was Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem ...)
Next by thread: Re: "Doing It Right" (was Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem ...)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread