[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt

To: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
Subject: Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:19:43 +0200
Cc: rrg Group <rrg@psg.com>
In-reply-to: <48A099DB.1010007@employees.org>
References: <002301c8f86b$bfa9bb20$5d0c6f0a@china.huawei.com> <1218110898.27730.14.camel@tachyon> <BAC000E3-CC43-480A-A15E-09ADE0558446@muada.com> <6D824360BE5146F39D491FF0E5E8FC60@ad.redback.com> <A1F3BC03-B69D-4DB1-8806-21F9F828C634@muada.com> <48A099DB.1010007@employees.org>

On 11 aug 2008, at 21:58, Scott Brim wrote:

You can't deprecate identifiers in general. We need identifiers formobility and for multipath transport.


Two things that don't exist in the real world today...

So no need for those to hold us back.

And don't MIPv6, SCTP and TCP-over-shim6 all use regular IP addressesthat come with locator functionality as their ID?


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  - From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>

References:
- RE: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  - From: Sheng Jiang <shengjiang@huawei.com>
- RE: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  - From: Steven Blake <slblake@petri-meat.com>
- Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
- RE: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  - From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
- Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
- Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  - From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
Next by Date: Re: [RRG] Logistics preferences...
Previous by thread: Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
Next by thread: Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread