Re: addition of TLV to locator ID or locator ID set

[Paul Jakma <paul@clubi.ie>]

On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Erik Nordmark wrote:

> But the hosts don't even know they are assigned this prefix; it's 
> the shim that does it for them.
> Which is why I think this approach (like other NATish approaches) most likely 
> ends up requiring a two-faced DNS.
From experience, you can do static NAT at your border for a set of 
prefixes while routing them internally normally. The NAT is quite 
invisible within your AS, as it is outside your AS - only your 
borders know it.
You wouldn't need split DNS for the shim6 site-intermediary case 
AFAICT, because the locator addresses would never be reachable - only 
the mapped address would ever be a valid address to try reach.
Split DNS is fairly evil btw.

> That might be ok; we just have to understand the implications.
Aye.

>   Erik
regards,
--
Paul Jakma	paul@clubi.ie	paul@jakma.org	Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
love,  n.:
	Love ties in a knot in the end of the rope.