Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-v6ops-ent-scenarios-03.txt

["JORDI PALET MARTINEZ" <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>]

I also agree, and have REAL only-IPv6 customer networks NOW.

Regards,
Jordi

---- Original Message ----
From: "Tim Chown" <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 1:55 AM
Subject: Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-v6ops-ent-scenarios-03.txt

> On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 02:02:39PM -0400, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
>> 
>> I believe that this scenario is an interesting and important scenario
>> to explore.  How will people who are running highly secure/mobile
>> networks today transition to IPv6?
> 
> Margaret, I agree.  This should remain in the draft.
> 
> This example puts IPv6-only network infrastructure, with dual-stack nodes,
> on the radar for the solution space, and that is important, whether it's
> a military network or an Asian academic network.
> 
> I suspect there is some resistance because some people feel IPv6-only
> infrastructure is too early to consider.  I would disagree.  For example,
> the Chinese academic CERNET 2 network is IPv6-only, and is live now (but
> I don't know whether the sites/universities are IPv6-only infrastructure,
> but they're probably closer to doing it than any non-Asian academic
> sites). 
> 
> We have to think global in the scoping and solution space.
> 
> Tim


**********************************
Madrid 2003 Global IPv6 Summit
Presentations and videos on line at:
http://www.ipv6-es.com

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.