I don't think this addresses my personal comments. The most important
of them, an applicability statement about a security defence network
(supported by Richard Graveman at least), hasn't been included.
I apologize, but I think I missed what you suggested for an
applicability statement for the Security Defense network... Could
you summarize?
I believe that this scenario is an interesting and important scenario
to explore. How will people who are running highly secure/mobile
networks today transition to IPv6?
I do not want us to head down a rat hole of defining how things could
be done in IPv6 that cannot be done in IPv4 today, but if you have a
secure, highly mobile IPv4 network today (and some enterprises do,
particularly in the defense space), I do think it is interesting and
important to talk about how to deploy IPv6 into that type of network
without compromising security or mobility for IPv4, IPv6 or
dual-stack nodes.
At least within the U.S. Department of Defense there has been some
resistance to deploying IPv6 on "operational" networks, because of
uncertainty about the security implications of doing so. It would be
good for us to explore those implications, dispell any myths, and
close any holes that do exist.