[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Next steps


Okay, I'll bite!!!  :-)

Speaking only as an interested individual and long term ngtrans/v6ops participant...

I would like to see the v6ops finish up the scenario/analysis documents and start focusing on some of the important IPv6 operational issues that should (IMO) be the province of this WG.

For instance, I think that we could do some valuable work studying the security implications of running a dual-stack enterprise network and documenting some operational best practices for that type of deployment.

I'd also like to see us engage some the early IPv6 ISP-type operators (Japanese ISPs, the 6Net folks, Internet 2, etc.) and discuss their experiences, particularly an operational problems that they have experienced.

Margaret


At 9:00 PM +0100 11/3/04, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: 
Hi Jonne, Pekka,

I've requested, several times, in the last couple of days, to get the
information about any proposal that you have for the WG.

I will much prefer if you can provide any inputs, and we all discuss about
it.

No reply means to me that you don't have any proposal (as nothing should be
secret and openly discussed as you already indicated !), so anyone with some
ideas should start it, otherwise, we are missing precious time in the next
meeting.

Please, let me know urgently.

Regards,
Jordi




**********************************
Madrid 2003 Global IPv6 Summit
Presentations and videos on line at:
http://www.ipv6-es.com

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.