[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Next steps



Well, what I expected is a document or at least an email explaining this:

Discussion of the way forward - 15 mins, Chairs/ADs
  - GOAL: discuss and get consensus on how to proceed from here

The AD indicated that he asked for this, so I guess we should have "some"
document that at a minimum introduce the topic, options, etc. !

Can we see it ? Just an email will make it. Otherwise, we may need to spend
the complete meeting understanding that before taking a decision ? Don't
tell us later "no more mic" ! It will not be fair, and sure will be
appealed, believe me.

Moreover, remember that some people may be not in the meeting room, and they
have the right to know about this. Explain it now, is the best way to get
their inputs.

Thanks in advance for doing so !

Regards,
Jordi


> De: "Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Helsinki)" <jonne.soininen@nokia.com>
> Responder a: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> Fecha: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 22:44:05 +0200
> Para: ext Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com>
> CC: jordi.palet@consulintel.es, ext Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>,
> v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> Asunto: Re: Next steps
> 
> Everybody,
> 
> I agree with Margaret and I think this has been mainly in line with the
> direction of the WG: I believe we should finish the scenarios/analysis
> work ASAP and if there is need to do specification work, move the work
> to the Internet area. V6ops should refocus on the actual operational
> issues.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Jonne.
> 
> On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 22:33, ext Margaret Wasserman wrote:
>> Okay, I'll bite!!!  :-)
>> 
>> Speaking only as an interested individual and long term ngtrans/v6ops
>> participant...
>> 
>> I would like to see the v6ops finish up the scenario/analysis
>> documents and start focusing on some of the important IPv6
>> operational issues that should (IMO) be the province of this WG.
>> 
>> For instance, I think that we could do some valuable work studying
>> the security implications of running a dual-stack enterprise network
>> and documenting some operational best practices for that type of
>> deployment.
>> 
>> I'd also like to see us engage some the early IPv6 ISP-type operators
>> (Japanese ISPs, the 6Net folks, Internet 2, etc.) and discuss their
>> experiences, particularly an operational problems that they have
>> experienced.
>> 
>> Margaret
>> 
>> 
>> At 9:00 PM +0100 11/3/04, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
>>> Hi Jonne, Pekka,
>>> 
>>> I've requested, several times, in the last couple of days, to get the
>>> information about any proposal that you have for the WG.
>>> 
>>> I will much prefer if you can provide any inputs, and we all discuss about
>>> it.
>>> 
>>> No reply means to me that you don't have any proposal (as nothing should be
>>> secret and openly discussed as you already indicated !), so anyone with some
>>> ideas should start it, otherwise, we are missing precious time in the next
>>> meeting.
>>> 
>>> Please, let me know urgently.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Jordi
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> **********************************
>>> Madrid 2003 Global IPv6 Summit
>>> Presentations and videos on line at:
>>> http://www.ipv6-es.com
>>> 
>>> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged
>>> or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of
>>> the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient
>>> be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the
>>> contents of this information, including attached files, is
>>> prohibited.
> -- 
> Jonne Soininen
> Nokia
> 
> Tel: +358 40 527 46 34
> E-mail: jonne.soininen@nokia.com
> 
> 



**********************************
Madrid 2003 Global IPv6 Summit
Presentations and videos on line at:
http://www.ipv6-es.com

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.