At 12:01 AM +0100 11/4/04, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
Agree with your comments (for example your point about security is section 4
of the charter), in general, but reading the charter I still don't think
there is any place where is said that we should have proceed in serial-mode.
I wrote the original charter for this WG, and he intention at the
time was not to proceed in serial mode.
We were supposed to work on the scenarios/analysis before continuing
work on the coexistence/transition mechanisms, but the operational
work was intended to happen in parallel. At least during the time
that I was chairing the group, we did get some ISP/operator feedback
and do some work on operational work. We also continued working on
the documents that summarized v6 work needed in various areas,
provided advice to several areas that did lead to some important work
and published them.
However, it was always a challenge (before and after the ngtrans ->
v6ops transition) to get this particular WG actively engaged in the
work of the group.
I think that many of the efforts you have mentioned would be good
efforts for this group to undertake.