[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: POLL: SPs' IPv6 (tunnel) deployment requirements (fwd)

To: <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: POLL: SPs' IPv6 (tunnel) deployment requirements (fwd)
From: "Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@mcsr-labs.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 20:47:47 -0600
Cc: "Ralph Droms" <rdroms@cisco.com>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20041102083325.02a45ee0@flask.cisco.com> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0411021540110.14885@netcore.fi>
Reply-to: "Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@mcsr-labs.org>

Hi, Pekka,

Thank you for sending this off to NANOG.

I applaud anything the Operations Area does to increase dialog with NANOG, and the nice people at the NANOG 31 IETF feedback BoF said they really were interested in talking to us, they just had no clue how to figure out what we are doing or who to give feedback to...

Spencer

References:
- Re: POLL: SPs' IPv6 (tunnel) deployment requirements (fwd)
  - From: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
- Re: POLL: SPs' IPv6 (tunnel) deployment requirements (fwd)
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>

Prev by Date: Re: Next steps
Next by Date: Re: Next steps
Previous by thread: Re: POLL: SPs' IPv6 (tunnel) deployment requirements (fwd)
Next by thread: Re: POLL: SPs' IPv6 (tunnel) deployment requirements
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread