Re: Fwd: Re: draft-ietf-ngtrans-isatap-22.txt

["Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Helsinki)" <jonne.soininen@nokia.com>]

Alain,

yes, maybe this merits a few words about the status of the document:

1) The document has been submitted as an individual submission to the
RFC Editor. IESG has taken a look at it and some (minor) comments were
raised.
2) RFC Editor has asked the authors to address those comments
3) After the comments are addressed the document will be published by
the RFC Editor.

There are _no_ showstoppers in the way and this will be published. In
addition, whether to publish ISATAP later as a standards track document
is in no conflict with the process here.

I hope this clears the situation.

Cheers,

Jonne.
On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 17:50, ext Alain Durand wrote:
> Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Helsinki) wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I think what Fred is referring to are the comments that some IESG people
> > gave to the ISATAP specification. There were basically two comments: One
> > about the clarity of the security considerations section and one
> > addressing the clarity of the definition of the term site.
> 
> 
> Jonne,
> 
> Could you please clarify what is the exact status of the draft here?
> Yesterday, we've heard it was inthe RFC editor queue for Experimental
> and that the door was open to, if folks wanted, after experimental 
> feedback, clean-up the spec and republish it as PS with AD direct sponsor.
> 
> Do the IESG comments you mentionned above are blocking the publication
> now as Experiemntal or the potential later re-publication as PS?
> 
> 	- Alain.
-- 
Jonne Soininen
Nokia

Tel: +358 40 527 46 34
E-mail: jonne.soininen@nokia.com