On Mar 30, 2007, at 9:36 AM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
Either PS means something, in which case there is no rush, or it doesn't (in which case there is also no rush).I can't say more about my customer or their use case, but from my vantage point I have to respectfully disagree. Thanks - Fred fred.l.templin@boeing.com
With all due respect to your customer (I suspect I have an idea who it might be in general terms and had similar conversations on different specific topics over the past couple of days), RFC 2026 doesn't mention "the customer wants it" as a reason to take a document to PS, not does it mention announcing a need for it to be PS "as of today" as a reason that the IETF should jump through hoops. I would suggest that you consider following the procedures laid out there.