RE: draft-jiang-incremental-CGN (was: RE: Agenda)

["Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>]

Fred,

Maybe I am confused; the chairs asked a question after
the draft presentation, and I missed the boat on raising
my hand. What was the question that was asked - and is
it too late to still raise my hand?

Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fred Baker [mailto:fred@cisco.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 1:32 PM
> To: Templin, Fred L
> Cc: Sheng Jiang; IPv6 Operations; Brian E Carpenter
> Subject: Re: draft-jiang-incremental-CGN (was: RE: Agenda)
> 
> As I noted a few minutes ago regarding 6rd, and as we discussed when
> you wanted ISATAP picked up as a working group item, the charter
> precludes transition mechanisms as working group topics. You need to
> discuss this with an AD or an appropriate working group.
> 
> On Mar 25, 2009, at 1:06 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
> 
> > Had intended to say this at the mike, but I would like
> > to see this work taken as a wg item. Reason is that I
> > see a continued need for IPv4 clients to access IPv4
> > and IPv6 servers. Can we have this as a wg item?
> >
> > Fred
> > fred.l.templin@boeing.com
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Sheng Jiang [mailto:shengjiang@huawei.com]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 6:29 PM
> >> To: 'Fred Baker'; 'IPv6 Operations'
> >> Cc: 'Brian E Carpenter'
> >> Subject: RE: Agenda
> >>
> >> Hi, Fred,
> >>
> >> Could you add Brian Carpenter as co-author and presenter for the
> > following agenda
> >> item? Due to a known bug of auto-submission tool, Brian's name does
> > not recognized.
> >>
> >> An Incremental Carrier-Grade NAT (CGN) for IPv6 Transition
> >> Sheng Jiang, Dayong Guo, Brian Carpenter
> >>
> >> Many thanks and best regards,
> >>
> >> Sheng
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> >>> [mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker
> >>> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 7:55 AM
> >>> To: IPv6 Operations
> >>> Subject: Agenda
> >>>
> >>> So I am finally posting the agenda for our meetings next week.
> >>> I'll blame the delay on the late posting of drafts. Or
> >>> something like that :-)
> >>>
> >>>    http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/09mar/agenda/v6ops.html
> >>>
> >>> I need all of the presentations that people plan to use,
> >>> whether in PDF or PPT format, by Sunday night so I can post
> >>> them, please. We will run them from my laptop.
> >>>
> >>> Presenters, some of you have told me you only need ten
> >>> minutes, and I'll be hoping you do that. I asked for two
> >>> 2-hour sessions and got one 2.5 hour and one 1 hour session.
> >>> There is at least one discussion that I expect to warrant some
> >>> extra time, and what we have is about 20 minutes each.
> >>>
> >>
> >