Re: draft-jiang-incremental-CGN

[Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>]

There'll be another draft (so tech comments will be most
welcome). Before we ship that draft, we'l check with the
various ADs and WG chairs whether we should direct it
at a particular WG, or as an individual submission.

I would observe that this is actually a usage scenario;
we were fairly careful not to invent any new mechanisms
as such. The v6ops charter does include:
"4. Publish Informational or BCP RFCs that identify and
analyze solutions for deploying IPv6 within common network
environments, such as ISP Networks,..."

    Brian

On 2009-03-26 09:36, Templin, Fred L wrote:
> Fred,
> 
> Maybe I am confused; the chairs asked a question after
> the draft presentation, and I missed the boat on raising
> my hand. What was the question that was asked - and is
> it too late to still raise my hand?
> 
> Fred
> fred.l.templin@boeing.com
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Fred Baker [mailto:fred@cisco.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 1:32 PM
>> To: Templin, Fred L
>> Cc: Sheng Jiang; IPv6 Operations; Brian E Carpenter
>> Subject: Re: draft-jiang-incremental-CGN (was: RE: Agenda)
>>
>> As I noted a few minutes ago regarding 6rd, and as we discussed when
>> you wanted ISATAP picked up as a working group item, the charter
>> precludes transition mechanisms as working group topics. You need to
>> discuss this with an AD or an appropriate working group.
>>
>> On Mar 25, 2009, at 1:06 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
>>
>>> Had intended to say this at the mike, but I would like
>>> to see this work taken as a wg item. Reason is that I
>>> see a continued need for IPv4 clients to access IPv4
>>> and IPv6 servers. Can we have this as a wg item?
>>>
>>> Fred
>>> fred.l.templin@boeing.com
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Sheng Jiang [mailto:shengjiang@huawei.com]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 6:29 PM
>>>> To: 'Fred Baker'; 'IPv6 Operations'
>>>> Cc: 'Brian E Carpenter'
>>>> Subject: RE: Agenda
>>>>
>>>> Hi, Fred,
>>>>
>>>> Could you add Brian Carpenter as co-author and presenter for the
>>> following agenda
>>>> item? Due to a known bug of auto-submission tool, Brian's name does
>>> not recognized.
>>>> An Incremental Carrier-Grade NAT (CGN) for IPv6 Transition
>>>> Sheng Jiang, Dayong Guo, Brian Carpenter
>>>>
>>>> Many thanks and best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Sheng
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
>>>>> [mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 7:55 AM
>>>>> To: IPv6 Operations
>>>>> Subject: Agenda
>>>>>
>>>>> So I am finally posting the agenda for our meetings next week.
>>>>> I'll blame the delay on the late posting of drafts. Or
>>>>> something like that :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>    http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/09mar/agenda/v6ops.html
>>>>>
>>>>> I need all of the presentations that people plan to use,
>>>>> whether in PDF or PPT format, by Sunday night so I can post
>>>>> them, please. We will run them from my laptop.
>>>>>
>>>>> Presenters, some of you have told me you only need ten
>>>>> minutes, and I'll be hoping you do that. I asked for two
>>>>> 2-hour sessions and got one 2.5 hour and one 1 hour session.
>>>>> There is at least one discussion that I expect to warrant some
>>>>> extra time, and what we have is about 20 minutes each.
>>>>>
> 
>