[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-jiang-incremental-CGN (was: RE: Agenda)

I asked Gunter to send me his notes. Per them, I asked the working group what should be done with the draft, and found that few had read it. So I encouraged people to read it and comment to the list.
If it is adopted in an IETF working group, it will have to be in one that is chartered to work on transition mechanisms; note that behave and softwires are already working on these, and 6rd is being taken to softwires as an alternative tunneling approach. After we have comments on this draft, we will be an in better position to discuss its next steps. 

On Mar 25, 2009, at 1:36 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote:


Fred,

Maybe I am confused; the chairs asked a question after
the draft presentation, and I missed the boat on raising
my hand. What was the question that was asked - and is
it too late to still raise my hand?

Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Fred Baker [mailto:fred@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 1:32 PM
To: Templin, Fred L
Cc: Sheng Jiang; IPv6 Operations; Brian E Carpenter
Subject: Re: draft-jiang-incremental-CGN (was: RE: Agenda)

As I noted a few minutes ago regarding 6rd, and as we discussed when
you wanted ISATAP picked up as a working group item, the charter
precludes transition mechanisms as working group topics. You need to
discuss this with an AD or an appropriate working group.

On Mar 25, 2009, at 1:06 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote:


Had intended to say this at the mike, but I would like
to see this work taken as a wg item. Reason is that I
see a continued need for IPv4 clients to access IPv4
and IPv6 servers. Can we have this as a wg item?

Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Sheng Jiang [mailto:shengjiang@huawei.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 6:29 PM
To: 'Fred Baker'; 'IPv6 Operations'
Cc: 'Brian E Carpenter'
Subject: RE: Agenda

Hi, Fred,

Could you add Brian Carpenter as co-author and presenter for the

following agenda

item? Due to a known bug of auto-submission tool, Brian's name does

not recognized.


An Incremental Carrier-Grade NAT (CGN) for IPv6 Transition
Sheng Jiang, Dayong Guo, Brian Carpenter

Many thanks and best regards,

Sheng


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
[mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 7:55 AM
To: IPv6 Operations
Subject: Agenda

So I am finally posting the agenda for our meetings next week.
I'll blame the delay on the late posting of drafts. Or
something like that :-)

  http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/09mar/agenda/v6ops.html

I need all of the presentations that people plan to use,
whether in PDF or PPT format, by Sunday night so I can post
them, please. We will run them from my laptop.

Presenters, some of you have told me you only need ten
minutes, and I'll be hoping you do that. I asked for two
2-hour sessions and got one 2.5 hour and one 1 hour session.
There is at least one discussion that I expect to warrant some
extra time, and what we have is about 20 minutes each.