[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Display of unicode characters?
At Sun, 10 Jan 2010 21:12:40 -0500,
David Abrahams wrote:
>
> I'm sorry, I see the post but I can't find anything that looks like a
> concise description of a solution there.
David,
I agree - Not being very familiar with lisp I had no time to follow
trough to something better. To get it done IMHO we need to speak of
maintenance of the whole bunch of apel, flim, semi, wl.
>
> I couldn't find a patch there. Can you help?
>
It is this one in flim 1.14.9 - this helped me when my umlauts had
been eaten. My posting refers to the original posting containing the
patch by Yamaoka-san on
http://osdir.com/ml/mail.wanderlust.general/2008-04/msg00007.html.
Please find it reproduced here.
----------------------8<---------------------------------------
--- mel-q-ccl.el~ 2006-06-12 15:10:02 +0000
+++ mel-q-ccl.el 2008-04-03 06:33:51 +0000
@@ -893,7 +893,13 @@
(defun quoted-printable-ccl-encode-region (start end)
"Encode the region from START to END with quoted-printable encoding."
(interactive "*r")
- (decode-coding-region start end 'mel-ccl-quoted-printable-lf-lf-rev))
+ (save-excursion
+ (goto-char start)
+ (insert (prog1
+ (decode-coding-string
+ (string-as-unibyte (buffer-substring start end))
+ 'mel-ccl-quoted-printable-lf-lf-rev)
+ (delete-region start end)))))
(defun quoted-printable-ccl-insert-encoded-file (filename)
"Encode contents of the file named as FILENAME, and insert it."
----------------------8<---------------------------------------
> > (i386-apple-darwin9.8.0) <--- LOL
>
> You mock?
Yep, a little bit - don't take it seriously: why one would try to use
somethig that awkward like emacs and wanderlust under the most useable
system ever ;-}
> None that I can find. Most mentions of MULE are in fact in wl and its
> dependent packages.
Basically, I was just wondering why it is still necessary if there is
unicode (besides backward compatibility).
> >
> > And for a quick check: do you see umlauts and unicode characters here ?
> > (for me, all these are working).
> >
> > German: ae===oe===ue===ss==
> Yep, they work.
None of them I see in your reply, and I haven't seen your curly quotes
in the original posting either.
Best regards
Jürgen