Re: Mail encryption, possible problem with SEMI

[Michael Welle <mwe012008@gmx.net>]

Hello,

Michael Welle wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Michael Welle wrote:
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Kazuhiro Ito wrote:
> > > 
> > > [1  <text/plain; US-ASCII (7bit)>]
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > > In mime-edit-encrypt-pgp-mime a recipient list is calculated. A
> > > > to-header like 'foo bar <foo@a.b>' is therefore parsed into three
> > > > elements 'foo', 'bar' and 'foo@a.b', which results in three key ids
> > > > (depending on the contents of your key ring). Unfortunately, the key
> > > > ids resulting from 'foo' and 'bar' are unrelated to this mail in my
> > > > case (tons of different keys can be found for foo). And even the key
> > > > found for foo@a.b might not be the one one want to use.
> > > 
> > > Please try attached patch (not tested for S/MIME nor gpg's named
> > > group).
> > thank you for the quick response. I applied the patch and it works for
> > me. Over the next days I will do more testing.
> after applying the patch the message isn't encrypted additionally with
> the sender's key anymore. This makes it impossible to read the
> messages from your own outbox.
I set mime-edit-pgp-encrypt-to-self now, which I never set before, and
it seems to work again as expected.

I wonder if a lot of wl users use signing and encryption?

Regards
hmw


-- 
biff4emacsen - A biff-like tool for (X)Emacs
http://www.c0t0d0s0.de/biff4emacsen/biff4emacsen.html
Flood - Your friendly network packet generator
http://www.c0t0d0s0.de/flood/flood.html