[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Permission to copy/publish your IETF draft document

To: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@columbia.edu>
Subject: Re: Permission to copy/publish your IETF draft document
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 03:59:21 +0100
Cc: kenh@cmf.nrl.navy.mil, Eric Rosenfeld <e.rosenfeld@CableLabs.com>, iesg@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <3E7FA5BB.1060204@columbia.edu>
References: <E63E74E1F5391449BDFCAE1F352EC7DC086BBE@srvxchg.cablelabs.com><3E7FA5BB.1060204@columbia.edu>

[cablelabs not copied]

I have asked the IETF lawyer to clarify what the legal status of a right-to-include on an Internet-draft is.

Separately, we may need to notify ITU & cablelabs that they are being stupid.

Harald

--On mandag, mars 24, 2003 19:41:31 -0500 Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@columbia.edu> wrote:

This is absolutely not acceptable.

There is good reason why this document has not been moved forward to RFC
status.  This document is not meant to ever be published.  It is a place
holder to ensure that some very controversial ideas are maintained for
further discussion.

Please remove the text of this draft from the ITU-T.  Please send me the
contact information for the Chair of ITU-T Study Group 9.

References:
- Re: Permission to copy/publish your IETF draft document
  - From: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@columbia.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: You may not want us to see this
Next by Date: Re: who volunteered to set up bugzilla for WG issue tracking?
Previous by thread: Re: Permission to copy/publish your IETF draft document
Next by thread: Re: Permission to copy/publish your IETF draft document
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread