[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FW: [Entmib] Minutes from SF (fwd)

To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Subject: Re: FW: [Entmib] Minutes from SF (fwd)
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 18:36:12 -0700
Cc: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, iesg@ietf.org
References: <5.2.0.9.2.20030422221549.02d414b8@mail.binhost.com><7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155016A35E6@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucen t.com><7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155016A35E6@nl0006exch001u.nl.luce nt.com><5.2.0.9.2.20030424102115.0362c508@mail.binhost.com>

> I think that both MUST and SHOULD requirements ought to be included in 
> interoperability testing.  However, I think that MAY is going too 
> far.  Consider the following:
> 
>          Implementations MUST support Triple-DES.
>          Implementations SHOULD support AES.
>          Implementations MAY support any other algorithms as well.
> 
> I would like to see two implementations of Triple-DES and AES.  The rest is 
> too open ended.

one should test that the protocol allows plugging in any arbitrary
protocol

randy

References:
- Re: FW: [Entmib] Minutes from SF (fwd)
  - From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
- Re: FW: [Entmib] Minutes from SF (fwd)
  - From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Evaluation: draft-mealling-iana-xmlns-registry - The IETF XMLRegistry to BCP
Next by Date: Re: radius in draft-heinanen-radius-pe-discovery-03.txt
Previous by thread: Re: FW: [Entmib] Minutes from SF (fwd)
Next by thread: Re: FW: [Entmib] Minutes from SF (fwd)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread