A couple of observations (having been bitten last week). The ID tracker lists the steps for getting protocol actions onto the agenda: 1) Last call 2) need writeup (there is a "waiting for writeup state") 3) waiting for AD go ahead (in case the Last Call raised issues, etc.) 4) on agenda Only after step 3 can a document show up on the agenda. In the past I (and probably others) would send in a writeup and expect the evaluation to go out and the document to show up on the next agenda. But that didn't happen for me last week like I expected. :-( But thinking about it, I wasn't clear enough, and we probably need to adjust our thinking so that we are all on the same page and know the proper steps. What I think should happen: 1) having a writeup is a precondition for an evaluation going out. A document blocks in a waiting for writeup after the LC ends. 2) writeup needs to go in. (secretariat needs to do their thing, changing to state "waiting for AD go ahead". 3) AD asks to put on agenda, moves to next state. This action causes the evaluation to get sent out (it shouldn't go out until AD go-ahead has been given) So, to be clear, be sure when sending in an evaluation whether you also want the evaluation to be sent out and the document to go on the next agenda. Secretariat will not (should not) make assumptions about our intentions. In the past, the assumption has been "send out the evaluation immediately". But the correct one is probably "sent it out only when the AD says to. Make sense? Note, Russ, secsh-dns got tripped up I think because of inconsistant assumptions about what was supposed to happen. You must have done the writeup at the same time you asked for the Last Call, and the evaluation did go out, and it did appear on the agenda... I guess the rest of us haven't historically been so quick to get our writeups in... Thomas