Re: Internal WG Review: Recharter of IP Telephony (iptel)

["James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>]

I interacted with Henning on this when I first started on IAB. These
drafts are actually fairly good and I encouraged him to continue
working on them, but I think he lacked the time.

I think it would be worthwhile for someone who had more time to take
ownership and update them.

            jak

----- Original Message -----
From: "Geoff Huston" <gih@telstra.net>
To: "Harald Tveit Alvestrand" <harald@alvestrand.no>; "Peterson, Jon"
<jon.peterson@neustar.biz>; "'Patrik Fältström'" <paf@cisco.com>;
"Jonathan Rosenberg" <jdrosen@dynamicsoft.com>
Cc: "The IETF Secretariat" <ietf-secretariat@ietf.org>;
<iesg@ietf.org>; <iab@ietf.org>; <fluffy@cisco.com>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 11:02 PM
Subject: RE: Internal WG Review: Recharter of IP Telephony (iptel)


>
> >Henning Schultzerinne had a very long one which I'm unable to
locate just
> >now - it might never have made it out of the IAB review cycle, or
my I-D
> >archive may be incomplete.
>
> It never made it out
>
> I have 2 pdf files
>    draft-schulzrinne-iptel-arch-00.pdf
> and
>    draft-schulzrinne-iptel-challenges-00.pdf
>
> which were about as far as the work got.
>
> If someone wants to review this work for the effort here I'm
> happy to send them a copy
>
> regards,
>
>     Geoff
>
>
>
> At 01:14 PM 18/05/2003 +0200, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
> >I think Jonathan's text is quite sufficient for the charter. Its
message
> >(apart from what it says) is "we have thought about this, and can
answer
> >questions for more details" - which is important.
> >
> >--On fredag, mai 16, 2003 16:29:48 -0500 "Peterson, Jon"
> ><jon.peterson@neustar.biz> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>Agreed that a charter probably isn't the right place to explain in
detail
> >>the delineation between ENUM, TRIP, SIP server location via DNS,
and so
> >>on. Personally, I think the text suggested by Jonathan below is
useful,
> >>but a more complete description of the difference between these
> >>mechanisms is warranted. An Informational-track document
explaining all
> >>of this would be nice - I worked on something along these lines,
though I
> >>never completed it (I needed to add text about TRIP). If we need a
WG to
> >>take responsibility for producing such a document, I agree that
IPTEL
> >>would be a good choice.
> >
> >Randy had a very short one published as draft-ymbk-enum-trip (July
2001).
> >Henning Schultzerinne had a very long one which I'm unable to
locate just
> >now - it might never have made it out of the IAB review cycle, or
my I-D
> >archive may be incomplete.
> >
> >Resurrecting one and completing it might be worthwhile.
> >
> >                  Harald
> >
>
>
>
>