Re: Internal WG Review: Recharter of IP Telephony (iptel)

["James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>]

Harald,

My recollection is that most of it was a straightforward explanation
of the IP telephony architecture. At least, that was my impression of
with the first document, draft-schulzrinne-iptel-arch-00.pdf, if my
memory serves. The other one was somewhat more questionable, as it was
largely Henning's opinions. Do you have a copy of your notes on what
problems you found with the document?

I don't recall having seen Randy's document, perhaps you can give me a
pointer to it so I can take a look?

            jak



----- Original Message -----
From: "Harald Tveit Alvestrand" <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: "Geoff Huston" <gih@telstra.net>
Cc: <iesg@ietf.org>; <iab@ietf.org>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 11:56 PM
Subject: RE: Internal WG Review: Recharter of IP Telephony (iptel)


>
>
> --On tirsdag, juni 10, 2003 16:02:10 +1000 Geoff Huston
<gih@telstra.net>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >> Henning Schultzerinne had a very long one which I'm unable to
locate
> >> just  now - it might never have made it out of the IAB review
cycle, or
> >> my I-D  archive may be incomplete.
> >
> > It never made it out
> >
> > I have 2 pdf files
> >    draft-schulzrinne-iptel-arch-00.pdf
> > and
> >    draft-schulzrinne-iptel-challenges-00.pdf
> >
> > which were about as far as the work got.
> >
> > If someone wants to review this work for the effort here I'm
> > happy to send them a copy
> >
>
> deleting some CCs....
>
> note that I was QUITE unhappy with Henning's arch document at the
time, and
> made quite a bit of comments about it - I would prefer building on
> Randy's..... there's only so much you can get wrong in 3 pages, and
it's
> FAR easier to notice the errors....
>
>                Harald
>
>