Re: Format of Draft Minutes of the June 26, 2003 IESGTeleconference

[Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>]

--On 27. juni 2003 11:43 -0700 hardie@qualcomm.com wrote:

> Hi,
> 	Thanks for the effort to shift to more complete
> sentences.  As a wording change, may I suggest moving
> those which are "document remains under discussion by $AD_NAME"
> to "document remains under discussion by the IESG in order to
> resolve points raised by $AD_NAME".  I think that would be
> clearer to outsiders, both as to what went on and what is being
> done to move forward.
Query: Would it be sufficient to say "$AD_NAME has raised issues with this 
document"? I'm no lover of long texts in boilerplate..... and your sentence 
had 15 words, compared to 7 in the original (counting $AD_NAME as one).

Not suggesting it's worth changing for this version, but for the discussion 
on what the format should be.....

                Harald