Re: MIB review guidelines ptr added to: http://www.ietf.org/IESG/wgch airs.html

["C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>]

Folks,

The link mentioned below is temporarily broken because a new version
of the MIB review guidelines was posted to the I-D repository this
morning and the link has not yet been updated.  You can access the
new version of the document at this URL:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ops-mib-review-guidelines-02.txt

I've already asked Bert to notify the Secretariat to make the
necessary updates.

Mike Heard
guidelines doc editor

On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:

> Just so all WG chairs know, the iesg-secretariat has added a ptr
> to the Mib-Review-Guidelines (those used by MIB doctors to review
> MIB documents when asked by IESG or ADs) to the wgchairs web
> page at: http://www.ietf.org/IESG/wgchairs.html
>
> If you want to go to them rigth away, the current MIB-Review-Guidelines
> are in document:
>    www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ops-mib-review-guidelines-01.txt
>
> If you (WG chairs) or your WG members or MIB document editors/authors
> have any issues, concerns, comments on thise review guidelines, pls
> holler and let us know about it (mibs@ops.ietf.org is the best
> mailing list for it, but if you send it to me I will handle).
>
> Whenever a MIB document comes to the IESG, the responsible AD normally asks
> me (OPS NM AD) to get a MIB Doctor review done (often before we issue
> an IETF Last Call). So that is where this comes into play.
>
> Of course, if WG chairs review MIB documents against those guidelines
> themselves first (or make their WG members or doc editors/authors do so),
> then that will make the approval process go faster/smoother.
>
> Hope this helps
> Bert Wijnen
> co-AD OPS (NM) Area
>
>
>
>
>