Dealing with your IESG appeal

[Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>]

Tony,

we've put the text of your appeal up on the IESG web pages at
<http://www.ietf.org/IESG/APPEALS/tony-hain-appeal.txt>

Is this the right text to your appeal, or is there anything else you'd like 
to add to it?

My understanding of what you write is:

- You're appealing the decision of the WG chairs to declare consensus taken 
during the San Francisco WG meeting

- The basis of the appeal is that the question asked was unclear

- You wish for the declaration of consensus to be overturned

On the last point, to be more exact: Are you asking for:

- a declaration that there was no consensus on deprecating site-local in 
the WG meeting?
- a declaration that we do not know whether there was a consensus or not on 
deprecating site-local in the WG meeting?
- a declaration that there are reasonable interpretations of the words 
"deprecate site-local" for which the meeting did not have consensus?
- a declaration that there are reasonable interpretations of the words 
"deprecate site-local" for which we do not know whether or not the meeting 
had consensus?

Your text refers to the mailing list discussion only by saying "The 
question asked to the list was no clearer." Do you wish us to treat the 
determination of consensus on the list as a separate issue, or do you wish 
us to consider the behaviour of the chairs in the meeting only?

                  Harald