[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xmppwg] Re: Last Call: 'XMPP Core' to Proposed Standard

To: xmppwg@jabber.org
Subject: Re: [xmppwg] Re: Last Call: 'XMPP Core' to Proposed Standard
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 20:47:49 -0400
Cc: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>, iesg@ietf.org, SASL WG <ietf-sasl@imc.org>
In-reply-to: <3F849A43.6020508@columbia.edu> (Jeffrey Altman's message of "Wed, 08 Oct 2003 19:14:11 -0400")
References: <E1A2aZr-0007VE-Jl@asgard.ietf.org> <3F8334ED.80504@isode.com> <6.0.0.22.0.20031008195111.03af8bc8@127.0.0.1> <3F849A43.6020508@columbia.edu>
User-agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux)

Do we actually need to have this argument here?  I tend to agree with
Kurt but it's not clear that having this discussion will actually
influence the draft.

Jeff, do you see anything wrong with allowing a SASL security layer
and TLS to be used in conjunction?  If I'm reading your argument
right, you have not actually presented any argument against this
configuration, you have just argued that Kurt's reason for wanting to
do so is not correct.

References:
- Major SASL issues (was Re: Last Call: 'XMPP Core' to Proposed Standard)
  - From: Alexey Melnikov <Alexey.Melnikov@isode.com>
- Last Call: 'XMPP Core' to Proposed Standard
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: Last Call: 'XMPP Core' to Proposed Standard
  - From: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@columbia.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: [xmppwg] Last Call: 'XMPP Core' to Proposed Standard
Next by Date: Re: Proposal from mstjohns: Pre-approval of RFC 2727bis
Previous by thread: Re: Last Call: 'XMPP Core' to Proposed Standard
Next by thread: Re: [xmppwg] Re: Last Call: 'XMPP Core' to Proposed Standard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread