Re: 58th IETF WG/BOF Scheduling - Draft Agenda as of October 01

[Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>]

Marcia,

Thursday, October 16, 2003, 4:55:03 AM, Marcia Beaulieu wrote:
> Alex,

> Sorry, but I did not see your message with your conflict list in it.  I 
> have moved
> VRRP to Thursday morning at 0900-1130
> Other groups scheduled at that time are: dhc, grow, tewg, sipping, and inch

  I forgot to add GROW to my list of conflicts (should have
  been there next to PTOMAINE), sorry :( !

> Do you know which area tewg is moving to?  Hopefully not RTG!

TEWG should be moving to O&M.

Alex.

> Hopefully this works for you.

> Marcia

> At 08:44 AM 10/14/03 -0700, Alex Zinin wrote:
>>Marcia,
>>
>> >> > MONDAY, November 10, 2003
>> >> > 0900-1130 Morning Sessions
>> >> > RTG       vrrp     Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol WG
>> >> > SUB       ccamp    Common Control and Measurement Plane WG
>> >>
>> >>FYI, CCAMP is about to be moved to RTG
>>
>> > VRRP has been moved to Wednesday morning at 0900-1130.
>> > Other groups scheduled at that time are: l3vpn, netconf and sip
>> > No conflicts were found with this schedule change per the information
>> > given by the working group chairs.
>>
>>VRRP and L3VPN are a conflict for me.
>>I thought I sent my conflicts to agenda. Here they are
>>one more time in order of priorities:
>>
>>  All RTG and SUB-IP WGs, l2vpn, l3vpn, ptomaine, mboned, multi6,
>>  v6ops, mipv4, mipv6, mobileip
>>
>>The rest looks fine.
>>Thank you!
>>
>>Alex
>>
>> >> > 1130-1300 Break
>> >> > 1300-1500 Afternoon Sessions I
>> >> > INT       mip4     Mobility for IPv4 WG
>> >> > OPS       mboned   MBONE Deployment WG
>> >> > RTG       forces   Forwarding and Control Element Separation WG
>> >> > RTG       ospf     Open Shortest Path First IGP WG
>> >>
>> >>All 4 above are conflicting for me. In order of priorities:
>> >>  ospf/forces
>> >>  ospf/mboned
>> >>  ospf/mipv4
>>
>> > OSPF has been moved to Monday at 1530-1730
>> > Other groups scheduled at that time are simple, ipoib, netconf ipsec, dccp
>> > rserpool
>> > No conflicts were found with this schedule change per the information
>> > given by the working group chairs.
>>
>> >> > 1930-2200 Evening Sessions
>> >> > RTG       rtgarea  Routing Area Meeting
>> >> > TSV       pwe3     Pseudo Wire Emulation Edge to Edge WG
>> >>
>> >>I would expect this to be a conflict to some routing people.
>> >>Not as high priority as direct RTG WG collisions.
>>
>> > Unable to accommodate at this time.
>>
>> > Marcia
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >>Please see if you can resolve these.
>> >>Thanks!
>> >>
>> >>Alex