RE: Evaluation: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-routing-08

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

Russ, your DISCUSS and also your COMMENTS have been addressed
in new revisions of both documents. I think they are OK now.
Pls check and if you agree, then pls remove your DISCUSS

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russ Housley [mailto:housley@vigilsec.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 14 oktober 2003 16:50
> To: iesg@ietf.org
> Subject: Evaluation: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-routing-08
> 
> 
> COMMENT on draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-routing-08:
> 
>    The Abstract is very weak.  I propose:
> 
>         This document specifies routing extensions in support 
> of carrying
>         link state information for Generalized Multi-Protocol 
> Label Switching
>         (GMPLS).  This document enhances the routing 
> extensions required to
>         support MPLS Traffic Engineering (TE).
> 
>    Move the single paragraph in section 1 to the top of 
> section 2.  This will
>    turn section 2 into a very good introduction.
> 
>    Spell out first use of SPF.
> 
> DISCUSS on draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-gmpls-extensions-11:
> 
>    Need a normative reference for IEEE floating point format.
> 
> COMMENT on draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-gmpls-extensions-11:
> 
>    Move the single paragraph in section 1 to the top of 
> section 2.  This 
> will turn
>    section 2 into a very good introduction.
> 
>