[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: spam from upperside.fr
To paraphrase Scott Bradner in Vienna, "no, no, and no".
In own my humble yet spectacularly correct (in this case)
personal opinion...
Spencer
--- Michael Sneed <sneedmike@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> This is surprising to me, and I only posed the question to
> determine the
> extent of the problem. If we are willing to tolerate "good
> spam", should we
> also permit postings advertising printer cartridges, since
> most of us use
> those occasionally as well? Or maybe only posters advertising
> "high
> quality" printer cartridges. Does rejecting such postings
> require WG
> consent?
>
> Regards,
>
> Mike
>
>
> >From: Tom Taylor <taylor@nortelnetworks.com>
> >CC: Michael Sneed <sneedmike@hotmail.com>, wgchairs@ietf.org
> >Subject: Re: spam from upperside.fr
> >Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 13:35:16 -0500
> >
> >This link reminds of one aspect of the process where postings
> from
> >non-members to Megaco became moderated: it was done with the
> consent of the
> >members of the list. Similarly, if you have had no
> complaints about
> >Upperside but feel they are a nuisance, you should consult
> with your list
> >on whether they think postings from Peter Lewis should be
> moderated.
> >
> >There was one point in the list of guidelines that worries
> me: the
> >requirement that copies of rejected postings be retained for
> a reasonable
> >period. Maybe this comes under the "obvious irrelevance"
> exception, but
> >when I go through the Megaco list of postings from outsiders,
> I use the
> >Mailman web interface. I tick off the ones to be deleted
> (most of them)
> >and as far as I know, they disappear. Does Mailman hang on
> to them at all,
> >or should we screen-scrape any postings we are
> rejecting/deleting that seem
> >like they may be controversial?
> >
> >Tom Taylor
> >
> >Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> >
> >>In message <BAY10-F6hGYeUOMfp2N0004d507@hotmail.com>,
> "Michael Sneed"
> >>writes:
> >>
> >>>The adslmib list has been getting spammed recently by a
> "list member".
> >>>This member is subscribed with the "nomail" flag set, and
> generally posts
> >>>advertisements for conferences via "upperside.fr".
> >>>
> >>>We are apparently not the only recipients of these "gifts".
> Has anyone
> >>>else had a problem with these guys? I have warned him, but
> it hasn't
> >>>helped.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>See http://www.ietf.org/IESG/STATEMENTS/moderated-lists.txt
> >>
> >>You can also ask your AD to ask the IESG to ban the list
> member.
> >>
> >>
> >> --Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
> Enjoy MSN 8 patented spam control and more with MSN 8 Dial-up
> Internet
> Service. Try it FREE for one month!
> http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup
>
>