Re: Some slides for tonight

[Leslie Daigle <leslie@thinkingcat.com>]

Hmmm.

Of course, I don't know what was discussed about the plenary at this
morning's IESG breakfast, but...

My sense is that this is more dramatic than it needs to be.  Yes, people
are confused about the messaging from last night, but a simple, direct,
clarification slide or two should make it clear that last night was
meant just to be normal dialoguing.  

If people catch the relation of this to last night's plenary, it will
make it seem like there was a constitutional crisis, which I don't
believe there was.  At all.  

And I don't believe your chairmanship is being questioned here.

Perhaps it just troubles me because this reviews how *you* fit into
the picture, and kind of undoes the optics we tried to achieve by
both being on stage yesterday?

Can we not just put up the 2 question slides from last night and say 
"last night was suggestions, not announcement"?

Leslie.

Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
> I looked at the slides I'd used when I took on this job, to see if I 
> could use some of the pictures.
>
> They seemed to say exactly what I want to say.
>
> I changed one slide and one title, and added the "disappearing logo" to 
> the first page that I should have added the first time around.
>
> Does this make sense?
>
>                   Harald


--

-------------------------------------------------------------------
"Reality:
     Yours to discover."
                                -- ThinkingCat 

Leslie Daigle
leslie@thinkingcat.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------