Re: RADEXT charter for comment...

[Barney Wolff <barney@databus.com>]

On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 07:15:15PM -0800, Bernard Aboba wrote:
> 
> In theory an existing RADIUS implementation supporting VSAs already needs
> to be prepared to support sub-attributes within VSAs, since RFC 2865
> says that is a possibility.  Therefore if an implementation already
> supported that (optional) feature of RFC 2865, no software update should
> be required (assuming that the sub-attributes are comprised of existing
> RADIUS data types).

Yes, but how does changing the sub-Type field from 1 byte to 14 bits and
adding a couple of flags not require a code change?  Am I missing
something obvious?

-- 
Barney Wolff         http://www.databus.com/bwresume.pdf
I'm available by contract or FT, in the NYC metro area or via the 'Net.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>