[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Determining WG consensus on Issue 226: RFC 3576bis and Renumbering

To: "David B. Nelson" <dnelson@elbrysnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: Determining WG consensus on Issue 226: RFC 3576bis and Renumbering
From: Alan DeKok <aland@nitros9.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:08:59 +0200
Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <003401c7a6bb$694eb710$5d1216ac@xpsuperdvd2>
References: <BAY117-W103726FB2BBBE968E7757493210@phx.gbl> <003401c7a6bb$694eb710$5d1216ac@xpsuperdvd2>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070604)

David B. Nelson wrote:
> It seems to me that these options would apply equally to any attribute that
> could be either (a) a session identifier attribute or (b) a session
> re-authorization provisioning attribute.  This would include the use of
> VSAs, as discussed in another message.
> 
> Right?

  Yes.  The list is near-infinite.

  Alan DeKok.


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

References:
- Determining WG consensus on Issue 226: RFC 3576bis and Renumbering
  - From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
- RE: Determining WG consensus on Issue 226: RFC 3576bis and Renumbering
  - From: "David B. Nelson" <dnelson@elbrysnetworks.com>

Prev by Date: Proxies and dead home servers
Next by Date: RE: Proxies and dead home servers
Previous by thread: RE: Determining WG consensus on Issue 226: RFC 3576bis and Renumbering
Next by thread: RE: Determining WG consensus on Issue 226: RFC 3576bis and Renumbering
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread